Please forgive this post—it is going to sound very geeky and intellectual and not at all like my usual description of fun things I have done. I just had one of the coolest moments in my academic career, and I want to share this with you.
In my History of Ideas 5 (Modern Thought) class, we have an assignment to choose a book off of a short list, read it, and write a short analysis/review of the ideas in it. As a computer scientist and an individual with at least some knowledge in this area, the text I chose was How We Became Posthuman by N. Katherine Hayles. It is probably the most interesting thing that I have ever read, but not for the reasons you might expect.
To avoid going into gory detail, the book is basically about the relationship between physical reality and disembodied information, the connection between science and literature, and a number of other things all surrounding the ideas of cybernetics and informatics (think cyborgs like the Terminator or RoboCop). The most interesting thing to me, though, is the fact that it plays on so many subjects I have touched on in other classes. Yes, it is about technology, and I am in a good position to understand the arguments because of my basic understanding of the way modern computing works. The important part is all of the other subjects it mentions. For example, there are elements from the Intro to New Media course I took last year. We discussed technological concepts like text-based MUDs, cyberpunk literature, and the like and also looked into their implications from a social, psychological and philosophical perspective. That course gave me the basic background on cybernetics and the various arguments and issues surrounding it. That also sounds obvious, given that it is also a course about technology.
Beyond that, however, there are elements from all kinds of other sources. I have always been a fan of science fiction, so there are ideas from texts I have read for my own entertainment (specifically, Neuromancer by William Gibson, Ilium and Olympos by Dan Simmons, and Accelerando by Charles Stross, all of which I highly recommend). There are also ideas that were discussed in my Critical Methods in English course that I took earlier this year, most importantly Lacan’s and Saussure’s discussion of the relationship between signifier (words) and signified (ideas). There was even something from my Landmark Discoveries in Natural Science course last year: we discussed Thomas Kuhn’s model of scientific progress as a series of paradigm shifts, and the author of How We Became Posthuman specifically mentions that the progression of cybernetics does not follow a “Kuhnian” model.
My History of Ideas professor refers to this as “echoes.” You take a course and learn about some ideas, then you hear those ideas somewhere else in a slightly different context, and so on. Eventually you start to see the same ideas showing up all the time and you begin to understand how closely everything relates to everything else. It’s a phenomenon that appears to be very common among History of Ideas students in particular. My professor laughingly said that that made us schizophrenic. I personally think that it enriches what I learn and deepens my understanding of ideas, philosophy, sociology—pretty much everything, really. This example in particular shows the kind of synthesis that comes from having encountered so many ideas in several disciplines, and it really emphasizes exactly the reasons why I chose to study computer science at a liberal arts school. I can learn how to program a computer anywhere, but it takes a liberal arts school to show you how what you’re doing shapes the society you live in and vice versa. I find the whole thing absolutely fascinating.
Anyway, that’s the end of my geek-rant. I do have some events and things that I would like to tell you about in the near future, so stay tuned for those. See you later!